Review of Research Papers in Islamic Economics and Finance
To catalyze systemic transformation, the author introduces the Global Housing Resilience Accelerator (GHRA), which implements a mechanism called Tokenised Sustainable Equity for Safe Housing (TSESH). By leveraging technological and regulatory advancements in block chain and blended finance, TSESH transforms trapped housing equity into a liquid, verified resilience asset class called Resilience Property Tokens (RPTs), structured with binding social protection covenants.
The paper begins by addressing the post-colonial emergence of Islamic economics, which sought to establish an independent discourse based on interest-free commerce, moral behavioral norms eschewing self-interest, and the pursuit of social justice. Despite these ideal goals, the field has faced severe criticisms from scholars such as Prof. Timur Kuran, Prof. Akram Khan, and Prof. Syed Tahir for failing to develop a unique value set, an original methodology, or the analytical power necessary to solve modern economic problems.
The study identifies two primary economic mechanisms: a loss of human capital leading to illegal revenue seeking and a decrease in survival probability which reduces the perceived long-term cost of punishment. While the paper is technically robust within its econometric framework, it operates within a strictly secular, rational-choice paradigm that fails to account for the metaphysical and moral dimensions of human behaviour during crisis.
The author argues that the Sunnah presented a forward-thinking model long before the modern concept of sustainability emerged. This model emphasizes resource preservation, responsible consumption, and the protection of future generations’ rights. Unlike modern secular models, the Sunnah is argued to provide a holistic framework that integrates spiritual, moral, and practical dimensions into environmental care. The author argues that environmental protection is an inherent part of the higher objectives of Islamic law (Maqasid al-Shariah), specifically the preservation of the five essentials: religion, life, intellect, progeny, and wealth.
The paper contrasts this self-centred economic model with moral philosophy. Egalitarian ethical theories which include Utilitarianism, Rawls’s theory of justice, Situation Ethics (Joseph Fletcher), and Kantian ethics (Categorical Imperative), all require that, as a necessary condition for morality, one must treat the welfare of others the same as or equally to one’s own welfare.
The authors note that the instability leading to crisis is assumed away by the models which assume inherent stability. Economists are confined to models of stable states that are perturbed by limited external shocks. Economists failed to incorporate the intrinsic recurrent boom-and-bust dynamics characteristic of a complex economic system. Consequently, ‘systemic crisis’ is treated as an ‘otherworldly event’ absent from theoretical frameworks.
Islamic digital currencies must refrain from a number of actions deemed prohibited by Islamic law, in contrast to traditional cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin. They cannot entail interest-based transactions (Riba), undue speculation or uncertainty (gharar), or gambling (maysir). Their frequent backing by physical assets, such as gold, gives them inherent stability and lessens the speculative bubbles that are typical of traditional cryptocurrencies, which is what makes them so intriguing.
The authors argue that these two fields have traditionally been studied separately, with corporate responsibility focused on the meso (corporate) level and leadership responsibility on the micro (individual leader) level. The proposed relational model seeks to overcome this separation by viewing leadership as a relational phenomenon that is not tied solely to individuals but is instead a “social process” involving all stakeholders.
Mainstream economic policies often prioritize short-term goals, such as inflation control and GDP growth, over addressing the root causes of unemployment. This short-sighted approach can lead to unemployment persistence, even during periods of apparent economic growth. By contrast, behavioural economics urges policymakers to adopt long-term and holistic strategies that prioritize social welfare and sustainable job creation, offering a more nuanced and comprehensive perspective on addressing unemployment.
The banks’ ESG commitment can be in the form of adopting ESG framework in their banking operation and business strategy, incorporating ESG in credit assessment, and integrating ESG commitment in their banking products. In the case of Islamic banks, incorporating the environmental pillar can be adopted in the form of promoting green financing and integrating environmental risks in the banking operation. At the policy level, the financial authority is required to have an ESG framework to be implemented in the banking industry.
Islamic Economics Project 