The report calls for a new policy consensus based on equity, economic security for all, and solidarity. It emphasizes the need for structural transformations in policy, institutions, norms, and mind-sets, and a fundamental reorientation of policymaking through a social lens. A new consensus must prioritize strong social policies, investments in public institutions, and a people-centred approach to development, moving beyond the current over-reliance on markets.
This year’s Human Development report examines what distinguishes this new era of AI from previous digital transformations and what those differences could mean for human development (Chapter 1), including how AI can enhance or subvert human agency (Chapter 2). People are already interacting with AI in different ways at different stages of life, in effect scoping out possibilities, good and bad, and underscoring how context and choices can make all the difference (Chapter 3). Human agency is the price when people buy into AI hype, which can exacerbate exclusion (Chapter 4) and harm sustainability. And, of course, who produces AI and for what matter a lot for everyone (Chapter 5).
Authors argue that some nations are wealthier and more prosperous than others because of their political and economic institutions (e.g. government, market system). Good (inclusive) institutions enable investment and a sense of security in the government and the economic system and so nations prosper, but bad (extractive) institutions do not. Virtuous circles of innovation, expansion and peace are formed from inclusive institutions which form a cycle of increasing prosperity. Prof. Acemoglu and Prof. Robinson argue that exclusionary policies designed to enrich the elites and exploit the poor majority have prevented technological innovation, as the existing elites fought tooth and nail against anything that might endanger their privileges.
The annual global Multidimensional Poverty Index (MPI), jointly published by the Human Development Report Office (HDRO) of the United Nations Development Program and the Oxford Poverty and Human Development Initiative (OPHI) at the University of Oxford since 2010, measures interlinked deprivations in health, education and standard of living that directly affect a person’s life and wellbeing. Breakdown by component indicator shows what deprivations poor people experience, which can guide the choice of poverty reduction interventions to achieve the greatest impact.
January 2024 issue of Moral Reflections on #Economics is online. It features article on UN #SDGs and #Gaza Crisis, Highlights of Multidimensional #Poverty Index Report 2023, IEP Public Poll results on Economic Boycott, book review of #Islam and Economic Security by Yousuf Qaradawi, research paper in focus on #Halal tourism by Dr. Punit and regular sections of reflections, #news, economic and financial indicators and call for papers. Download for free.
In this paper, the author had attempted to provide a systematic literature review on Waqf using two prominent research databases, i.e. Scopus and Web of Science. The author, in final analysis, analyzed 257 research documents.
Islamic Economics Project 