Using a contract-theoretic model, Khan compares two financial arrangements: the Fixed Return Scheme (FRS), which mirrors conventional debt, and the Variable Return Scheme (VRS), which represents profit-and-loss sharing (PLS) contracts such as Mudarabah or Musharakah. His analysis assumes a single lender allocating a fixed pool of funds across many independent projects, with symmetric information and costless observability.
The earlier scholars provided application of Islamic juristic principles to derive and apply the Islamic teachings related to commerce, entrepreneurship and consumption. Muslim scholarship initially focused on public finance and its administration to deal with the practical problems of the newly formed state which expanded rapidly and required sound legal and administrative framework to legislate economic activities centred around agriculture and trade.
The global momentum behind sustainable development has elevated ESG principles to a central position in both corporate and public sector strategies. The Global Sustainable Investment Review (2020) reports that assets managed under sustainable investment strategies reached USD 35.3 trillion, representing over one-third of total professionally managed assets worldwide. Despite this impressive shift, the practical implementation of ESG is beset by challenges, with the agricultural sector particularly affected due to its central role in food security, economic development, and environmental stewardship. Conflicts over land rights, water resources, environmental impacts, and social inequalities are common and often impede progress toward sustainability and inclusivity.
In Islamic jurisprudence, money (mal) serves primarily as a medium of exchange, a store of value, and a unit of account. Classical jurists such as al-Ghazālī and Ibn Taymīyah stressed that money must not be used for speculative ends or to generate guaranteed returns (riba), nor should it expose transacting parties to undue uncertainty (gharar) or resemble gambling (maysir). Extending these timeless principles into the digital age, a Shariah-compliant CBDC must preserve the objectives of Islamic law (Maqāṣid al-Sharīʿah) by fostering economic justice, preventing harm, and promoting communal welfare.
Mainstream economic policies often prioritize short-term goals, such as inflation control and GDP growth, over addressing the root causes of unemployment. This short-sighted approach can lead to unemployment persistence, even during periods of apparent economic growth. By contrast, behavioural economics urges policymakers to adopt long-term and holistic strategies that prioritize social welfare and sustainable job creation, offering a more nuanced and comprehensive perspective on addressing unemployment.
Clarity on issue of Riba is so important in Shari’ah that while recognizing change in value due to change in quality, it does not force us to exchange different qualities in equal quantity and yet in case of Amwale Ribuwiah, it does not allow these to be directly exchanged with any excess of weight (quantity) on either side. As generally understood by our scholars, this restriction was essential to stop practice of Riba by hiding behind difference in quality.
The omission of the family from ESG frameworks is not a minor oversight—it is symptomatic of a deeper malaise within secular ethics and governance. As Professor Nejatullah Siddiqi once noted, “The preservation of family is not a cultural preference—it is a civilizational necessity.” The Mf-ESG model, with its Tawhidic, Maqasidic, and civilizational foundations, offers a corrective to the ESG paradigm’s moral myopia. It presents a model of sustainability not limited to compliance and metrics but inspired by meaning, purpose, and transcendence.
This model deserves further exploration and institutional support through high-level scholarly forums, international think tanks, policy summits, and academic curricula. It bridges theory and practice, faith and governance, offering not only a critique but a constructive framework for a just and flourishing civilization.
Prof. Khurshid Ahmad argues that the Western model of development overemphasized industrialization, capital formation, and technological transfer while neglecting social and cultural factors. This approach adopted as it is by the third world countries has led to negative consequences, including increased poverty, inequality, and dependence on foreign aid. Prof. Khurshid Ahmad emphasizes that the Islamic concept of development focuses on human development across moral, spiritual, and material dimensions. It encompasses the purification and growth of individuals and societies, striving for comprehensive well-being and prosperity in this world and the hereafter. He lists the goals of development policy within an Islamic framework which include human resource development, expansion of useful production, improvement in the quality of life, balanced development, evolution of new technology, and reduction of national dependency on the outside world.
He wrote extensively on Islamic microeconomics giving the Islamic perspective to the theory of consumer and producer behaviour. He would go beyond philosophical debates and narratives to also discuss the operationalization of the analysis of consumer and producer behaviour. He wrote several books, book chapters and research papers on Economics, Microeconomics, Development Economics, Essays on the issues in Islamic Economics and Islamic Banking.
Author states that the validity of the homo economicus model has been challenged by substantial empirical evidence showing that human beings are not entirely rational in their economic decision making, and are prone to cognitive biases and sociological factors. Herbert Simon proposed the concept of “bounded rationality” to describe the limitations of human rationality. The behavioural economics movement also sought to incorporate psychological insights into economic analysis, to construct more realistic models of human behaviour. The validity of the homo islamicus model has also been questioned for being overly idealistic and not necessarily reflecting the actual behaviour of Muslim economic agents, who are profoundly shaped by the modern social context.
Islamic Economics Project 